Dialling up the Universe

What a difference a day makes. Following the difficulties of polar alignment the previous day and faced with another great night of clear sky, the only thing to do was to get back on the horse and try again.  I was a little more careful with the basic set-up using two star alignment (Vega & Markab) before attempting the polar alignment again (without the polar scope) using Rasalhague; with the sight-lines at Fairvale Observatory blocked by houses, hedges, trees and the inevitable light pollution, even finding suitable stars is proving difficult and requires some pre-planning.  Following the previous confusion between the Manual and the SynScan handset on this matter, this time I decided to ignore the Manual sections dealing with separate adjustment of latitude and azimuth and, as the SynScan handset instruction prompted, carry out both procedures at the same time.

Having not previously owned the mount’s more basic brother, the EQ6, I am not able to say what all the differences are but, having read reviews of the AZ-EQ6 GT before purchasing, it is my impression that the T-bolt altitude combined with the more traditional azimuth knobs are a new invitation, making simultaneous adjustment of both easier.  For this reason I also suspect that the procedure has been changed in the SynScan firmware (V 3.33), which is not reflected in the Manual; Skywatcher and others please note – these apparently small anomalies can cause great confusion for leaners such as me.  And so it was that this time the polar alignment worked, reducing the error from about +/-3 to less than 10.  Furthermore and notwithstanding my previous point on ignoring the Manual, having re-read the final part of the instructions, it is made clear that on repeating the process the accuracy can be reduced even more.  Therefore after two alignment routines – star and polar alignment – the latitude (MEL) and azimuth (MAZ) polar errors were reduced to a mere few seconds.  This was by far the best I have ever achieved, which was subsequently reflected in the operating accuracy of the mount’s search function (so-called GOTO) and tracking.

I had already experienced the wonder of punching in search objects using the AZ-EQ6 mount – solar, Messier, NGC etc – but with mixed results due to poor alignment.  Now, for the first time with very good alignment, having entered in the desired object the mount slewed gracefully to its location so that on a test camera exposure the object was dead centre in the resulting picture and perfectly focussed.  Another seminal moment in my pursuit of astronomy and imaging the Universe and all its wonders.  I was thrilled, and still am.

Having established this set-up and with a clear sky overhead most of the night, what else was there to do but dial up the Universe using SynScan and start taking pictures, lots of them.  SynScan has an object database of over 40,000, so it might take a while.

M57 Ring Nebula, wide-field view, with polar alignment. Canon 700D | 24x30sec @ ISO1600

M57 Ring Nebula, wide-field view, with polar alignment.
Canon 700D | 24x30sec @ ISO1600

M57 Ring Nebula, close-up with polar alignment. Canon 700D | 24x30sec @ ISO 1,600

M57 Ring Nebula, close-up with polar alignment.
Canon 700D | 24x30sec @ ISO 1,600

M57 The Ring Nebula, cropped from the main image above.

M57 The Ring Nebula, without polar alignment.

M27 Dumbbell or Apple Core Nebula, with polar alignment. Canon 700D | 20x40secs @ ISO800

M27 Dumbbell or Apple Core Nebula, with polar alignment.
Canon 700D | 20x40secs @ ISO800

M27 cropped from previous photograph; it will be interesting to see how much clearer pictures can eventually be obtained with better alingment and longer exposures

M27 without polar alignment

Smoke and mirrors

My brain hurts! The Talking Point section of the recent October edition of the Astronomy Now magazine really poses a serious problem for astronomers, if not the Universe itself; matters don’t get much bigger. The matter being, Is the Universe a Hologram?  It transpires that one of the theoretical consequences of quantum physics and, in particular, very small matter, is that at the smallest scale the Universe may be two dimensional.  The third dimension, emerging in the same sense that an impressionist painting is the macroscopic effect of thousands of spots of coloured paint that, when viewed close up, gives no clue to the overall scene.  I am not making this up.   So serious is this question that Fermi National Laboratory Accelerator Laboratory (Fermilab) in the USA is currently undertaking an experiment to assess the answer; what happens if it is a hologram, do we disappear?  As a result of this devastating possibility, I have read around but frankly am battling to fully understand the concept and its consequences.   http://www.smithsonianmag.com/science/what-universe-real-physics-has-some-mind-bending-answers-180952699/?no-ist

In the event that the answer is in the affirmative, then what have I been photographing out there?

Astrophotography seems to consist of many black arts, not the least of which, in my case, is Polar Alignment. Since getting into this astronomy malarkey I have, wherever possible, taken the easy route – unfortunately this is no longer compatible with my ambitions and I must deal with my astronomy fears: polar alignment, computer control and using a guide scope.  All are essential if I am to improve my pictures and bag some of the more elusive DSOs as well as more mundane objects.  Initial use of the AZ-EQ6 GT mount has already been rewarding through the use of star alignment but without good polar alignment too, a critical piece of information for finding and tracking objects is missing.  In order to track objects across the celestial sphere using an equatorial mount, it is essential to line up the axis of the mount with the Polaris star, which marks the central point around which the celestial sphere effectively rotates.

The AZ-EQ6 GT mount does have a polar scope through which to look directly at the Polaris star and line up the mount.  Alas I cannot use it as my house is directly in the way of Polaris and I don’t really feel like knocking it down, though you never know.  However, there are cunning ways to overcome this problem (i) using another sequence programmed into the mount’s SynScan control handset to achieve polar alignment without a polar scope (see manual #11.3) or (ii) drift alignment, a technique of iterative realignment of the altitude and azimuth by linking the telescope to specific computer software (I believe it can also be undertaken by just using a star trace obtained by a DSLR or CCD camera).

For the moment I am having great difficulty attempting to use the SynScan routine.  Having spent much of Sunday studying the technique, subsequent hours of practice at night brought little success; despite my best attempts, the SynScan handset routine does not seem to be the same as that outlined in the Manual – not a good start.  Sometimes the operation of this complex equipment seems elusively to be driven by smoke and mirrors, let’s hope the Universe fairs better at Fermilab.

M2 Star Cluster; after hours of preparation and attempts to apply the Synscan polar alignment routine, with the P{olar Scope, success proved elusive and tracking poor. Canon 700D | 15x30 sec @ ISO 400

M2 Star Cluster; after hours of preparation and attempts to apply the SynScan polar alignment routine, without the Polar Scope, success proved elusive and tracking was poor.
Canon 700D | 15×30 sec @ ISO 800

Très Bon

My astronomy has been limited over the past couple of weeks as a result of the aforementioned cycle tour of the Loire.  After an 11 hour night crossing of Le Manche from Portsmouth, we headed south from Saint-Malo along the River Rance via Rennes and thence to the Loire, just east of Nantes.  Thereafter, just like the river, we meandered slowly upstream taking in vineyards and chateau, eventually reaching Blois before returning to Tours to take the easy way to the Ouistreham ferry by train.  All-in-all we cycled 428 miles and had a great time, in no small part due to fantastic weather the whole time.

One of the advantages of cycle camping and the inevitable call of nature during the night, is that you get to see the sky and what a sky! From the first night at Tinténiac the night skies were crystal clear, with wonderful horizon-to-horizon views not unlike that seen at home at the moment but without the clouds and light pollution – with such clarity the great spectacle of the Milky Way was always present.  The downside of cycling is that you can’t take astronomy equipment with you.  However, on the first night by laying my compact camera on the ground pointing upwards and set manually, I managed to get a good picture of the sky (it’s about 2am and I was a bit sleepy).  Such skies and better continued throughout the whole trip.

The night sky at Tinténiac

The night sky at Tinténiac

t’s therefore interesting and not unsurprising, that the following night sky map of France shows that much of the country is free from excessive light pollution.  It is however surprising that they were only awarded their first dark sky status last year – the Pic di Midi International Dark Sky Reserve  in the Pyrénées.

http://ftapissier.free.fr/pl/zoom.html

I wonder if the nobility of the Loire appreciated the great skies they had – they would have (theoretically) had the use of a Newtonian telescope for a while before the revolution put an end to their indulgent lifestyles?

Challain-la-Potherie Chateau - nice place if you can affofd it!

Challain-la-Potherie Chateau – nice place if you can affofd it!

About the same time (1730 – 1817) Charles Messier certainly put the quality of the French skies to good use when he catalogued 110 Messier objects, consisting of nebulae, galaxies and star clusters, which today still forms a fundamental platform for astronomers.

My own ambitions over the coming winter months will be to view and image many of the Messier objects, which makes his work nearly 300 years ago seem all the more incredible – but then he did have clear skies. Très Bon.

Loire cycle team in Angers.  Chapeau!!!

Loire cycle team in Angers. Chapeau!!!

Fool’s paradise

Off today to discover what the skies of France are like – cycling to the Loire.  The Loire is littered with château the building of which, despite their undeniable beauty, reflected the detached world of the French aristocracy that ultimately ended in the French Revolution between 1787 and 1799; nice for some but ultimately unsustainable and dangerous for all.

We are faced today by a dichotomy that is equally dangerous, society’s dependence on the benefits of a science without (broadly speaking) an understanding of science.  A recipe for catastrophe that is playing out through day-to-day life, education, religion, the media, politics and policies – a fool’s paradise – neatly summarised by astronomer Carl Sagan:

“We live in a society absolutely dependent on science and technology and yet have cleverly arranged things so that almost no one understands science and technology.  That’s a clear prescription for disaster.”

http://www.csicop.org/si/show/why_we_need_to_understand_science

Gratuitous picture of M104, the Sombero Galaxy taken in La Palma this year, to brighten things up!

Gratuitous picture of M104, the Sombero Galaxy taken in La Palma this year, to lighten things up!

Perspective: A wider view of the Universe

Earlier this year we went to the island of La Palma in the Canary Islands, which is recognised as the best astronomy site in Europe, where more than twelve major observatories have been built at an altitude of 2,396 meters on Roque de los Muchachos http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roque_de_los_Muchachos_Observatory.  One of the engineers responsible for building and maintaining some of these observatories was Joan Genebriera, who subsequently went on to build his own private observatory on the island, which I reviewed in an earlier post https://watchthisspaceman.wordpress.com/2014/08/06/la-palma-nice-one-joan/.  Our trip was in order to undertake a week-long astronomy course with Joan and as part of this, develop (no pun intended) and fast track our knowledge of astrophotography.

Joan’s basic telescope and imaging set-up is, as you would expect, spectacular, with equally outstanding tracking:

  • Catadioptric Cassegrain-Relay 400mm telescope f5.6 (Larrose)
  • APO 120mm refractor f6.5 (Vixen)
  • Camera SBIG ST8300M
  • Camera SBIG CCD ST8XE
  • Camera Starlight Xpress CCD MX716 for use with spectrograph
  • Camera Canon 350 D DSLR

Of course this is just a list of equipment – it is what you do with it that matters and Joan’s expertise more than matched the quality of the equipment.  Over a number if evenings we undertook a series of photographic exercises using the 400mm Cassegrain-Relay telescope and the SBIG ST8XE CCD camera with RGB filters.  At the same time we rigged a Canon 350D camera on the refractor telescope to produce a contrasting, wide-field photograph to compare with the higher powered SBIG configuration.  We brought some of the unprocessed data / images back from La Palma but have unfortunately been unable to process the SBIG ones yet as they as FITS format, for which I have not yet found suitable software (more on this another time).  However, the Canon 350 D photographs are of equal but different beauty, which through the wide-field format show larger areas of sky, sometimes revealing vast groups of galaxies – amazing!

M1 The Crab Nebula Canon 350 D  | 240 secs @ ISO800

M1 The Crab Nebula
Canon 350 D | 240 secs @ ISO800

M3 a globular cluster in the constellation of Canes Venatici Canon 350 D | 240 secs @ ISO800

M3 a globular cluster in the constellation of Canes Venatici
Canon 350 D | 240 secs @ ISO800

M84 a lenticular or elliptical galaxy located in the inner core of the Virgo Cluster of Galaxies Canon 350 D | 240secs @ ISO 800

M84 a lenticular or elliptical galaxy located in the inner core of the Virgo Cluster of Galaxies
Canon 350 D | 240secs @ ISO 800

Virgo Group of Galaxies - a field of nine galaxies in the western part of the cluster group of over 2,000 galaxies! Canon 350 D | 240secs @ ISO800

Virgo Group of Galaxies – a field of nine galaxies in the western part of the cluster group of over 2,000 galaxies!
Canon 350 D | 240secs @ ISO800

Moving through space

Astrophotography is difficult, very difficult but probably one problem stands out above all others.  The platform we are taking the images from, Earth, is moving at about 67,000 mph on its way around the sun every 365 days and just over 1,000 mph rotating on its axis every 24 hours, which is tilted at approximately 23o relative to its orbit around the sun.  Over a year the annual journey around the sun, combined with the planet’s tilt provides us with the seasons and the astronomer with a different views of the universe, which despite the overall velocity does not unduly affect imaging over short periods measured in seconds or even minutes.  However, the rotation of the Earth every 24 hours is another matter, particularly when photographing objects over any period of time greater than a few seconds, which is required for most objects, especially more distant DSO.

In understanding how this last movement impacts on the nature of the sky we see and in order to photograph objects – as well as forming a basis for navigation around the night sky – we have developed a system that is analogous to that used for navigating across the globe i.e. Longitude and Latitude but now called Right Ascension or RA and Declination or DEC.

For the purpose of establishing lines of RA and DEC a celestial sphere must be imagined of an arbitrarily large radius, concentric with a celestial body – in this case Earth.  In a similar way to Earth, a celestial equator is likewise established, this being in the same plane as the Earth’s equator but projected upwards onto the celestial sphere – as a result if the Earths tilt, it too is inclined at 23.4o with respect to the elliptical plane.  Having established the sphere and the equator, RA is then described as the angular distance along the celestial equator and DEC measures the distance above or below the celestial equator along any RA line in degrees.  This imaginary framework can then be used to describe the positon of any object or its relative position over time in space in the sky that we see from Earth.

The Celestial Sphere - a grid of RA & DEC lines across the sphere can be used to define the position of objects in the sky. Looking south in the Northern Hemisphere, the Celestial Equator is inclined across the sky from east to west and bisected vertically due south by the Meridian line -  the optimal RA line for astromimaging

The Celestial Sphere – a grid of RA & DEC lines across the sphere can be used to define the position of objects in the sky. Looking south in the Northern Hemisphere, the Celestial Equator is inclined across the sky from east to west and bisected vertically due south by the Meridian line (not shown) – the optimal RA line for astroimaging

In order to follow an object for imaging it is necessary to hold the telescope / camera in a stationary position relative to the movement of the object; remember that we are at the same time spinning at 1,000mph relative to space.  This is very difficult but in astrophotography is usually achieved by the means of an Equatorial Mount which, through some very sophisticated software that computes the relative movements of the object and the telescope, gently slews the mount-telescope-camera combination using gears and belts in such a way that the telescope and hence camera, remain fixed upon the chosen object.  The result, when undertaken with care, will be a wonderful sharp image of an almost endless number of features in the night sky, which is the subject of many of the posts on this website

Conversely, what happens if we deliberately do not follow the sky’s objects in this way but hold the camera effectively still relative to the sky’s movement, created by Earth’s daily rotation.  The answer is Star trails, which I set out to obtain the other evening.  In order to achieve such a picture, the DSLR camera is fixed on a tripod and using an intervalometer, a long exposure of the night sky above is taken; alternatively a large series of shorter exposures can be made over a long period of time and then stacked to produce a better quality final image.  As a result the stars trace their respective paths of light across the camera’s sensor, as the Earth moves at 1,000 mph on its axis.  Such movement is normally indiscernible over short periods of time but through this process it is clear to see in the form of wonderful star trails.  Of course the stars haven’t moved at all (at least not in a normal visual sense) it’s us that are moving, very fast.  It is beautiful and clear evidence that we on Earth are continually moving through space!

Startrail Canon 700D | 20 minutes  f4 @ ISO 800

Star trails (inverted colour)
Canon 700D | 20 minutes f4 @ ISO 800

Startrail Canon 700D | 39x30secs f4 @ ISO 400

Star trails
Canon 700D | 39x30secs f11 @ ISO 400

 

Meet the neighbours

Earlier this week we were fortunate to have good sky conditions at Fairvale Observatory and I was therefore able to locate and image a new nebula, M27 the Dumbbell or Apple Core Nebula https://watchthisspaceman.wordpress.com/2014/08/20/astronomers-do-it-in-the-dark/ and for the first time, a galaxy.  As the birthplace of stars nebulae are almost beyond our comprehension, with their almost ethereal nature making them somewhat intangible to mere humans.  By comparison a galaxy has taken on what might seem a corporeal form, something that strangely seems more familiar and it should do, it is where we live.

It is for this this reason that I have been keen to capture a picture of my first galaxy from Fairvale Observatory; the picture at the top of the Home page on this site, which shows the Sombrero Galaxy, was taken in La Palma earlier this year so doesn’t count https://watchthisspaceman.wordpress.com/2014/08/06/la-palma-nice-one-joan/.  I’m not sure why but despite my enthusiasm for galaxies they have until now proved elusive; maybe the 150PL just wasn’t up to it or more likely, I was just finding them difficult to locate in the sky.  The Synscan feature on my new AZ-EQ6 mount has put an end to that, just dial it up!  And so it was that this week I got to meet the neighbours, in this case the closest spiral galaxy to our own Milky Way Galaxy, the Andromeda Galaxy.

As previously discussed, Earth is located on the edge of the spiral Orion Arm of the Milky Way, about 25,000 light-years from the centre. 

The Milky Way & Location of the Solar System i.e Earth

The Milky Way & Location of the Solar System i.e Earth

Some 2.5 million light-years away is the similar and beautiful spiral form of Andromeda, or M31.  Andromeda is the largest spiral galaxy of the so-called Local Group, a group of 54 galaxies, with its gravitational centre somewhere between the Milky Way and Andromeda and herein lies a problem.  Andromeda is approaching the Milky Way at 110 k per second or 300 k per second relative to our Sun i.e. us, due to its orbit around the centre of our galaxy – thus also making it one of the few blueshifted galaxies we observe on Earth.  As a consequence we are destined to get to know our neighbour Andromeda a lot better in the future, as both galaxies are likely to collide and merge in about 4 billion years, forming a giant elliptical galaxy.

M31 - Andromeda Galaxy Canon 700D | WO GT81 + FF | 10x30sec @ ISO800

M31 – Andromeda Galaxy                                                                         Canon 700D | WO GT81 + FF | 10x30sec @ ISO800

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

In the meantime enjoy this great spectacle in the night sky.  From Fairvale Observatory Andromeda has only just become visible in the eastern night sky at about midnight, so I am hopeful that as it moves across the sky over the coming months I will get even better opportunities to image the galaxy; by which time I have hopefully improved my alignment, tracking and exposure abilities and thus can obtain greater photographic detail of this beautiful galaxy.

M31 Andromeda Galaxy - Cropped & 'stretched' in GIMP from main picture

M31 Andromeda Galaxy – Cropped & ‘stretched’ in GIMP from main picture

Astronomers do it in the dark

We are lucky to have dark sky parks in the UK, which are defined as: an area, usually surrounding a park or observatory that is kept free of artificial light e.g. Exmoor National Park, Galloway Forest Park and Kielder Forest, Northumberland.  The transformation of the sky through the absence of man-made light is truly incredible – apart from the greatly increased clarity with which the stars can be better seen, it is the emergence of otherwise feint or nearly invisible DSO objects experienced in these conditions that is exciting for astronomers.

During my life I have been fortunate to see a number of really exceptional ‘dark skies’ around the world, which in my opinion significantly beat the dark sky parks here in the UK.  The most memorable were in the Kalahari Desert and the middle of the Red Sea during a scuba diving trip, which were to use a phrase straight from the sixties (I was there but can’t remember it!) – mind blowing!  Living on Earth probably the most striking feature of a dark sky is the ability to look clearly through the Milky Way galaxy in all its wonder, which thus appears as a creamy band crossing the sky – we are in fact looking edge-on through the millions of stars that make up our galaxy.  Without wishing to overly digress at this point, our Solar system within which we live is on the edge of the spiral Orion Arm, located about two thirds of the way from the centre of the galaxy – 25,000 light years away. http://www.universetoday.com/65601/where-is-earth-in-the-milky-way/

Given such an amazing setting it is disappointing to live in South East England here at Fairvale Observatory, with London just to the north and Gatwick airport to the south, thus significantly reducing the light quality of the sky and making astronomy hard work.  Just to make matters worse, I have to contend with houses and trees obscuring the sightline in almost every direction, passing aircraft (see previous blog on the ISS) and the ubiquitous street light.  Furthermore, even on a clear night for much of the month the Moon poses a significant obstacle to astronomy as it floods the sky with its reflected sun light.

Notwithstanding, good nights (relatively) do occur and last Sunday was one of them.  It was completely clear from dusk until late in the night, the Moon (last quarter) obligingly did not rise until almost midnight and, thanks to the aforementioned houses and trees, did not impact on Fairvale Observatory until after 1.00 a.m.  Furthermore, as the temperature was unseasonably cool as a result of dominant northerly winds, the air was still; which all added up to a great night for astronomy and imaging in particular.  And so it was that I set about trying to image my next set of targets with mixed but generally good results.  I have learnt that planning is everything in astrophotography, so using Stellarium I previously sought out those objects that would be high in the sky and were located on or about the celestial meridian; such a position reduces the thickness of the Earth’s atmosphere through which the light has to pass on its way to the camera sensor and thus improves the image quality.

I tried, once again unsuccessfully, to image NGC 7000, the North American Nebula – not through lack of photographic prowess but, I think, because I had not located it properly in the sky – another day then? Similarly I failed to capture NGC 6888, the Crescent Nebula.  However, against what was a good, dark sky at Fairvale Observatory I had better luck with M27, the Dumbbell Nebula and, photographed my first galaxy, at last! I will deal with the galaxy in my next blog so, for now, will focus (pun intended!) on M27.

My first image of a nebula taken by DSLR was only a couple of weeks ago, M57 or the Ring Nebula.  This time the target M27 was another Planetary Nebula (nothing to do with planets) of similar size but at 1,360 ly distance is almost 1,000 ly closer to Earth than M57, providing better imaging conditions; that’s 1,000 ly the light does not have to travel before reaching the camera.  At the moment I am still experimenting with the new equipment and seeking out new objects just for fun and, as a result, mostly taking a small set of short exposures (<=60 seconds) subs (pictures) and darks before stacking  and processing – in this case about 10 each.  The resulting picture quality leaves plenty of room for improvement when I eventually get the guide scope working, together with other planetary and alignment software but in the meantime I am very happy and excited by these results.  The wider, original photograph perhaps shows the Nebula best, which is also known as the Apple Core Nebula, a form that is just discernible from these images.  For the moment, my quest to capture new objects is going well, assisted greatly by the dark skies we are fortunate to have at the moment here at Fairvale Observatory.

Wide sky view - M27 the Dumbbell or Apple Core Nebula is located just off-centre at about 2 o'clock

Wide sky view – M27 the Dumbbell or Apple Core Nebula is located just off-centre at about 2 o’clock  Canon 700D | EO GT81 + FF | 10x40secs @ ISO 800

M27 cropped from previous photograph; it will be interesting to see how much clearer pictures can eventually be obtained with better alingment and longer exposures

M27 cropped from previous photograph; it will be interesting to see how much clearer pictures can eventually be obtained with better alignment and longer exposures

ISS: Gotcha!

For the past couple of weeks the International Space Station (ISS) has been orbiting close to my house.  This great App, the ISS Detector Satellite Tacker, provides a forecast (date, time, and trajectory) of when the ISS will pass close to your location and a graphical guide, operating in real time, indicating where to look https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.runar.issdetector&hl=en.  I have been using this App for over a year and it is excellent, the only thing it can’t help with is cloudy skies!  As a result of cloud and rain I have been struggling to photograph the satellite during this period, until last night when we had great viewing conditions from dusk until late in the night (more on that in a later blog).  At just past 9.30 p.m. last night the ISS passed nearby again, so that I was at last able to record its path on my camera.

Of course nothing is straight forward and living close to Gatwick airport doesn’t help.  In the first two exposures the ISS track was interrupted by aircraft crossing its path – at a much lower altitude of course.  However, it makes for some interesting pictures.

ISS track intersected by a passing aircraft

ISS track intersected by a passing aircraft                                                                                   Canon 700D | 200mm telescopic lens | 46secs @ ISO200           

And again!!

Better

The ISS is an amazing achievement.  Constructed in modular form by the USA and Russia since 1998, it measures approximately 73m x 109m x 20m, with a crew of 6, to date drawn from fifteen different countries.  The ISS travels around the Earth in a circular orbit between an altitude of 205 miles and 255 miles, at a speed of 17,227 mph, thus orbiting the Earth every 93 minutes!  As a result of this orbit it passes over or close to all the Earth’s surface, which means we all get a chance to see it (clouds permitting) every now and again – this is made possible by the Sun’s reflection off the station producing a bright golden flash as it passes.

At last, a clean shot of the ISS as it heads on its way towards the south east and out of view - back again in 93 minutes having traveled around the world!

At last, a clean shot of the ISS as it heads on its way towards the south east and out of view – back again in 93 minutes having travelled around the world!

Last night’s pass was from the west to the south east, at an inclination of about 45o, producing a very good view for about 5 minutes.  Similar views of other manmade satellites are also common but, of course, they don’t carry people.  What a great human achievement and an awe inspiring sight which I never tire of.  Fortunately, once the aircraft had passed I was able to get a ‘clean’ shot of the ISS, unfortunately this will be the closest I’ll ever get to travelling in space.

Fairvale Observatory Part-2: The next stage – equipment upgrade

Fairvale Observatory Part-1 dealt with my initial entry into astronomy and, in particular, my equipment.

I have established that I enjoy astronomy and, more so, determined that the way forwards for me should be Deep Sky Objects (DSO) and their imaging.  I can now see that imaging is not just a means of acquiring what are often beautiful, indeed spectacular pictures of features and objects in space but it is a tool with which to see what otherwise is at best elusive and most of the time, invisible to the eye – even viewing through a telescope.  As a professional geologist, it is comparable to my hand lens with which to open doors of knowledge and wonder in rocks and fossils, or my hammer with which to split rocks and unlock time capsules of the earth and its history. The comparison with astronomy is, in my opinion, very close and probably one of the reasons I have now decided to pursue astronomy. Given the scale of the Universe it is inevitable that DSO objects form the majority of what’s out there and therefore the quest to observe and understand them seems a natural, almost necessary way forwards.  And so it is that to pursue this new goal it has become necessary to upgrade my equipment.

The shortcomings of my initial equipment, a Skywatcher 150PL and EQ3-2 mount, helped in understanding what I was looking for in upgrading:

  • OTA too slow – for DSO objects the scope speed needs to be at least f6 or lower;
  • OTA open – a closed OTA reduces the impact of cold (dew) and warm (thermal currents) air on the light path and thus the eventual image, as well as requiring less maintenance;
  • Focus mechanism too coarse – to achieve focus when DSO imaging, in particular when using a field flattener, requires a focus to within a fraction of a millimetre – the 150PL lacks such finesse;
  • The mount is too light – in order to take long exposures a stable mount is essential, inevitably this requires sturdier, heavier equipment;
  • RA / DEC motor drives lack accuracy – to find, lock onto and finally track DSO objects a high degree of alignment and tracking precision is needed;
  • EQ3-2 mount cannot be programmed – both to improve the accuracy of finding and tracking, feedback loops between the mount, the OTA, the guidescope and various planetarium software is desirable.

OTA (optical telescope assembly) – William Optics GT81 FPL3 Triplet ED APO

Reading around I quickly came to the conclusion that an 80mm ED APO refractor was the best way forwards.  A refractor telescope might be thought of as a ‘typical’ telescope, in that the light passes straight through the object lens, which is then viewed directly at the other end or, for convenience using a diagonal.  With the introduction of glass lenses the problem that now needs to be overcome is chromatic aberration (coloured light ‘fringing’), caused by bending the light as it passes through the object lens to focus at the other end of the scope where it is viewed; such bending causes the light to ‘split’ like a rainbow.

The solution is to use a series of lenses, ground in different ways so that as the light bends through one lens it is corrected in the next and so on an so forth, until as near as possible white light is viewed at the point of focus (viewing) without the effect of chromatic aberration.  As might be expected the success in achieving such a result is mixed and not surprisingly directly linked to price.  Of course there is no shortage of ED APO refractors and my shortlist was narrowed down to Explore Scientific or William Optics (WO). The elimination of chromatic aberration is such an important feature that I chose the WO GT81 f5.9 triplet refractor with five lenses of extra-low dispersion (ED) glass; triplet is the holy grail object lens made of three lens elements.  Once focused, the result is a crystal clear view or image of the object – beautiful.  I chose WO as reviews were unanimously positive and it seemed that WO had a better range of accessories suited to imaging – I have not been disappointed.  The manufacturing is exquisite, beautifully finished and the scope is a pleasure to handle and use.

William Optics GT81 FPL3 Triplet ED APO Refractor attahced to a 4" Losmandy plate

William Optics GT81 FPL3 Triplet ED APO Refractor attached to a 4″ Losmandy plate

Aside from the optics, the rack and pinion focus mechanism provides fine or, through a secondary gold coloured knob, very fine adjustments, which can subsequently be locked to ensure there it does not shift as the scope is moved around or a camera is attached, thus changing the balance.  It comes with a base / foot that will attach directly to a standard dovetail slot, such as that on the EQ3-2 mount, though such is the excellent overall anodised finish it seems I pity to rough it up – I’ve therefore taped it over.  However, for regular use with the new mount the scope is bolted to a Losmandy plate, which has a number of holes and slots in order to vary its positon depending on requirements, which slots neatly into the head of the new mount with robust plastic topped screws to secure the plate.  The GT81 comes with two anodised top rings for a guide scope, the fixing screws of which are brass and plastic tipped to protect the finish of the guide scope – a thoughtful touch which says all you need to know about the attention to detail which is evident throughout. Finally, I purchased a WO RDF which fixes neatly on either side of the OTA and does the job nicely.

All in all, the WO GT81 is a great piece of equipment, which is a pleasure to use and delivers great results.  It is significantly smaller than the 150PL scope but delivers a much bigger punch, in all respects.

The Mount – Skywatcher AZ-EQ6 GT

The mount was always going to be one of the more advanced Skywatchers but which one?

I started with the EQ5 Pro in mind, as it seemed to have most of the technical facilities of its bigger brother the EQ6 but was lighter, which makes it easier to handle and move about – an important consideration given I have to move this out and in from the house all the time.  However, the EQ6 is not the choice of many experienced astronomers for nothing and, on closer inspection, it was apparent that its better technical credentials and larger payload capacity for greater stability made it the obvious choice.  By comparison the EQ6-EQ5-EQ3 capacities are respectively 18.2kg-13.7kg-5,5kg.  Finally when it came to purchasing, I went the next step and got the AZ-EQ6 GT Pro which, amongst other better features, is belt driven and therefore smoother when tracking and takes an even larger payload of 20kg.  I’m not sure if I will get any use from the alternative Alt-AZ function, as the Equatorial mode is more suited to imaging, but it is a great mount – works beautifully with excellent features.

In use the general balance of the mount is easy to adjust thanks to a lever operated clutch for the RA and a capstan-like wheel located at the top of the counterweight rod for DEC, which are both simple to release and secure at any time. The mount comes with two saddles, so that two telescopes can be used in parallel if required. Dual-coder technology usefully allows the telescope to be moved manually in either axis without the mount losing its positional information! Although not yet used, the mount has an autoguider port and periodic error correction (PEC).  Level and height are adjusted by means of adjusting and locking the stainless steel legs with well-made metal screw clamps, unlike the flimsy EQ3-2 equivalent. The RA and DEC motors and belts are contained in the main body and work accurately and smoothly, with the power source provided by a separate DC power unit; I’ve placed this in a water resistant box with the various power leads sitting neatly on top.

RA clutch - simple and easy to use

RA clutch – simple and easy to use

DEC clutch

DEC clutch

Saddle with Losmandy plate fitting

Saddle with Losmandy plate fitting

Stainless steel legs with robust adjustment clamp, unlike its younger brother the EQ3-2, you get what you pay for

Stainless steel legs with robust adjustment clamp, unlike its younger brother the EQ3-2, you get what you pay for

AZ-EQ6 Mount: Power & control centre

AZ-EQ6 Mount: Power & control centre

Control of the mount is via a handheld Synscan handset, the results of which are nothing short of amazing with over 42,900 celestial objects programmed!  Following a built-in 1, 2 or 3-star alignment process, a vast array of viewing or imaging opportunities can be programmed though the handset and then located, with the mount moving gracefully with a sinister whirr at a rapid slewing speed of 4.2”/sec and a tracking accuracy of 0.1436 arc minutes. Having previously undertaken this by hand with the EQ3-2 mount it is a new and delightful experience.

Synscan handset - the world (or in this case the Universe) at your fingertips, literally!

Synscan handset – the world (or in this case the Universe) at your fingertips, literally!

Accessories

All the existing lenses and other basics can be used with the new set-up.  However, following advice I did purchase three other items:

1. A 50mm William Optics guide scope, which will be clamped above the main OTA using the existing rings which, together with the ZWO 120MC webcam, will assist in tracking and maintaining a fix on objects during imaging – I have not yet put this to use.

2. A 2” William Optics dielectric diagonal, to make observing more comfortable; the ‘dielectric’ part is a mirror coating process, reputed to increase reflectivity and be more resistant – we shall see.

2. A William Optics field flattener, which is used for DSLR imaging, in order to ‘remove’ any apparent distortion of the image at the edges, with excellent results; though I found it very, very difficult to find the focus point at first.  Furthermore, the optics of the field flattener also acts as a x0.8 focal reducer, thereby changing the scopes speed from f5.9 to f4.7, which places it into the ‘serious’ category for DSO imaging.

All-in-all, the new equipment is a joy to use, with good results and holds great promise once all the features and software are fully up-and-running.

William Optics GT81 + AZ-EQ6 Mount set-up & imaging.  Nice one!

William Optics GT81 + AZ-EQ6 Mount set-up & imaging. Nice one!

Comments

Since taking up astronomy just over a year ago I have made good progress and now feel, with the new equipment, that this will keep me more than busy before the next upgrade needs to be made.  However, such is the quantum leap the new equipment provides, I expect that such changes in the future will be more incremental, such as scopes for specific tasks and various ‘must have’ accessories; notwithstanding, I can see that astronomy retailers are likely to do well for some time to come!

Summary of Equipment currently at Fairvale Observatory           

Scopes: William Optics GT81 FPL3 Triplet APO refractor f5.9, William Optics 50mm f4 guide scope & Skywatcher 150PL f8 Newtonian & 30mm finder scope

Mounts: AZ-EQ6 GT & EQ3-2 (+RA & DEC Motor Drive)

Lenses: Barlow: x2, Plössl 32mm, 25mm Wide Angle, 10mm, 6mm Ultra Wide Angle

Bins: Helios Naturesport Plus 10×50 wide-angle; Cameras: Canon 700D, ZWO ASI 120MC

Filters: Baader ND0.9 Moon, UHC, Light Pollution, Baader Astro Solar Safety Filter

Other Stuff: William Optics Field Flattener x0.8 Focal Reducer, William Optics 2” dielectric diagional, William Optics RDF, Telrad, Bahtinov Masks, Canon EOS T-piece, intervalometer, afocal camera bracket, Manfrotto binocular clamp, binocular RDF, Samsung laptop + numerous leads and connectors