Orion in Perspective

February 6, 2015 by grahamrob in Deep Sky Objects, Equipment, General Astronomy, Imaging, Widefield Imaging and tagged Orion, Photography | Leave a comment

Perspective:

The appearance of objects relative to each other, as determined by their distance from the viewer, or the effects of this distance on their appearance – The Free Dictionary.

Noun: The art of representing three-dimensional objects on a two-dimensional surface so as to give the right impression on their height, width, depth and position in relation to each other – Oxford English Dictionary

I have just finished an Open University MOOC (Massive Open Online Course) on Orion, which it has to be said was mixed in its content and quality. Notwithstanding, the course provided a useful basic understanding of objects in the Universe, particularly Orion, how they related to each other and as a whole. Through my professional experience I am used to viewing and understanding objects in 3D, all the more so since computer modelling has provided a tool with which to visually illustrate such spatial shapes and relationships. Although it is obvious that such relationships also describe the astronomical space in which we exist i.e. the Universe, and commonly describe the location of stars and other heavenly bodies by their distance, RA and DEC, I have seen very few of these objects visually modelled for common asterisms or constellations.

The constellation of Orion is probably the main feature of the winter night sky and it is certainly my favourite, particularly when looking at its rich content: M42 the Great Orion Nebula, the Running Man Nebula, the Horsehead and Flame Nebulae, M78, Barnard’s Loop and many more. Sadly after more than 4-months imaging these objects for the first time, Orion is now starting to rise very early in the evening and by 11pm is well past the Meridian – it will not be long before this magnificent feature will be gone for another year, until on the very early mornings of next October it will reappear again, can’t wait!

With my new found interest in astroimaging I have almost exclusively used a DSLR camera and focused my attention on DSO features, using a telescope and GoTo mount, somewhat neglecting the use of the camera for basic widefield photography. Apart from the attraction of playing with my new toys, I was put off by the lack of a suitable camera attachment and a wide angle lens; because of the inherent crop factor associated with the cropped digital sensors employed in most DSLR cameras (except very expensive full frame cameras), the real focal length of a camera lens will be extended and hence the field-of-view narrowed – in my case with a x1.61 crop factor, a 50mm lens operates at an apparent focal length of 80mm! However, using the top off an old camera tripod I recently I managed to jerry rig the camera onto the GoTo mount, thus providing tracking and enabling longer exposures. It’s only a start but there is great promise in such photography, as seen on this excellent website, and I intend to pursue more of these images with a better way of attaching the camera and decent wide-angle lens when I can.

As a result, on Christmas Eve I obtained my first reasonable image of the whole Orion constellation, which with better exposure shows the detail, beauty and context of the numerous DSO items contained within and images previously noted.

The Orion Constellation Canon 700D | 27 x 10 secs @ ISO 1,600 & calibration | 24th December 2014

The Orion Constellation
Canon 700D & Telephoto 200 mm | 27 x 10 secs @ ISO 1,600 & calibration | 24th December 2014

In the early days of my astroimaging about 12 months ago, I found focussing something of a challenge but, with the assistance of the wonderful Bahtinov mask and Live View on-screen computer focusing, I thought that had become a thing of the past, unfortunately not! Guided by the infinity mark on the camera lens for focussing, I set out to image some of Orion’s more elusive nebulosity, in particular Barnard’s Loop, with which I am fascinated – its enormous size of some 10^oor 600 arcminutes and complete absence from ordinary view are both intriguing, exciting and challenging. I had tried to photograph this feature before, which completely envelops Orion’s Sword and extends up towards Betelgeuse, but to no avail. With my bodged but useable camera set-up I tried again two weeks ago. This time the problem was once again focussing; it turns out that with widefield astroimaging using a standard camera lens, infinity does not necessarily mean infinity, as there is some leeway either side. The out-of-focus images that resulted could therefore not be stacked but, using a single image, calibration and extensive post-process stretching in Photoshop, Barnard’s Loop was finally revealed and even Lambda Orionis above Betelgeuse and Bellatrix, albeit very noisy and out of focus. Notwithstanding, I am pleased with this enticing glimpse and will return another day to rectify the problems.

The Orion Constellation & Barnard's Loop (up / north is left) AZ-EQ6 Mount + Canon 550D & 200mm Telephoto | 180 secs @ ISO 1,600 & calibration | 22nd January 2015

The Orion Constellation & Barnard’s Loop (up / north is left)
AZ-EQ6 Mount + Canon 550D & Telephoto 200 mm | 180 secs @ ISO 1,600 & calibration | 22nd January 2015

Since my first decent image of the Great Orion Nebula on a very early morning at the beginning of last October, I have had hours of fun and some frustration imaging various parts of the Orion Constellation. But despite my new familiarity with the Orion constellation, 3D modelling and, I’d like to think, good spatial awareness, I was still pleasantly surprised and impressed by this wonderful 3D video of the constellation produced by the Space Telescope Science Institute for NASA and used during the aforementioned Open University course, which really does put it all into perspective: The True Shape of Orion.

The absence of light

November 10, 2014 by grahamrob in General Astronomy, Imaging, Viewing, Widefield Imaging | Leave a comment

“Light thinks it travels faster than anything but it is wrong. No matter how fast it travels, it finds that darkness has got there first, and is waiting for it.” Terry Pratchet, Reaper Man.

It may seem something of a contradiction that as astronomers we seek very dark places and skies in order to see light, light that may have travelled millions of light years to get here – light travels 6 trillion miles in one year. For human beings the perception of darkness differs with the mere absence of light, due to the effect of afterimages that are produced by the unstimulated (by light) part of the eye. Typically our eyes will take between 20 and 30 minutes to fully adjust to darkness, at which time the eye becomes between ten thousand and a million times more sensitive than in daylight.

Objectively the Bortle Dark-Sky Scale describes nine levels of darkness and thereby quantifies the astronomical observability of celestial objects and impact of light pollution http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bortle . With digital photography the colour of a point is described on the camera’s sensor by three RGB (red, green, blue) values, each ranging from 0 to 255. Thus when each pixel is fully illuminated each colour component measures 255 or for an RGB image 255,255,255. Conversely when all values are zero or 00,00,00, it appears black. However, the night sky is not black but measures somewhere between 10 and 30 when imaged.

Night sky image (Eastern Veil) with dark point set at 0,0,0

Dark sky image (Eastern Veil) with dark point set at 20,20,20. This approximates best to the natural darkness of the night sky.

There are even four subdivisions to describe approaching darkness at night:

Civil Twilight: begins at sunset and ends when the sun is 6^obelow the horizon or more practically, it can be described as the period after sunset during which terrestrial objects can still be clearly distinguished. Normally the end of civil twilight is usually 20 to 30 minutes after actual sunset.

Nautical Twilight: describes the period when the sun is between 6^o and 12^o below the horizon, during this time it is now possible to take reliable star sightings at sea. It may more commonly be described as nightfall but it is still not strictly dark yet.

Astronomical Twilight: defined as the period when the sun is now between 12^o and 18^obelow the horizon. To the casual observer this may be considered dark but it’s not, only when Deep Sky Objects such as nebulae and galaxies can be viewed is it fully dark.

Therefore, only after this sequence is completed, which takes almost two hours after sunset here at Fairvale Observatory at this time of the year, does true astronomical night or darkness occur. The excellent FLO Clear Outside weather forecast website, which is linked on the front page of this website, shows the current timings for each of these periods every day along the top horizontal bar, just below the hourly sub-division headings.

Obviously this has a major bearing for astronomers and perhaps more so for astrophotography. So sensitive is the camera’s sensor that when using long exposures the cumulative light recorded, even in a dark-sky environment, may result in a bright image that will need to be corrected during processing. Notwithstanding, the holy grail for astronomers is a dark, clear sky and the biggest enemy (other than bad weather and cloudy skies) is light pollution, which is spreading inexorably across the globe.

At the beginning of this post is a NASA picture of the Earth at night, produced as a composite of image data from the Suomi National Polar-orbiting Partnership (NPP) satellite, taken in April and October 2012 over a period of 312 orbits. NPP passes over any given point on Earth’s surface twice every day, flying 824 kilometres (512 miles) above the surface in a polar orbit, circling the planet about 14 times a day http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/IntotheBlack/ . Away from the cities much of the other light from wildfires, fishing boats, gas flares or mining operation is also visible. Whilst undeniably a beautiful picture, for astronomers it highlights one of the major obstacles we are up against, light, or more accurately light present here on Earth. The night sky before the invention of the commercial light bulb by Tomas Edison in 1878 must have been a wonderful sight; I doubt that Messier (1730-1817) would have successfully catalogued all his 110 objects as easily with today’s skies.

The dark side of the world: city lights of Europe, Africa, Middle East & Central Asia

The dark side of the world, with light just over the western horizon.

Perspective: A wider view of the Universe

August 25, 2014 by grahamrob in AstroBin, Deep Sky Objects, Equipment, Imaging, Widefield Imaging and tagged La Palma | 1 Comment

Earlier this year we went to the island of La Palma in the Canary Islands, which is recognised as the best astronomy site in Europe, where more than twelve major observatories have been built at an altitude of 2,396 meters on Roque de los Muchachos http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roque_de_los_Muchachos_Observatory. One of the engineers responsible for building and maintaining some of these observatories was Joan Genebriera, who subsequently went on to build his own private observatory on the island, which I reviewed in an earlier post https://watchthisspaceman.wordpress.com/2014/08/06/la-palma-nice-one-joan/. Our trip was in order to undertake a week-long astronomy course with Joan and as part of this, develop (no pun intended) and fast track our knowledge of astrophotography.

Joan’s basic telescope and imaging set-up is, as you would expect, spectacular, with equally outstanding tracking:

Catadioptric Cassegrain-Relay 400mm telescope f5.6 (Larrose)
APO 120mm refractor f6.5 (Vixen)
Camera SBIG ST8300M
Camera SBIG CCD ST8XE
Camera Starlight Xpress CCD MX716 for use with spectrograph
Camera Canon 350 D DSLR

Of course this is just a list of equipment – it is what you do with it that matters and Joan’s expertise more than matched the quality of the equipment. Over a number if evenings we undertook a series of photographic exercises using the 400mm Cassegrain-Relay telescope and the SBIG ST8XE CCD camera with RGB filters. At the same time we rigged a Canon 350D camera on the refractor telescope to produce a contrasting, wide-field photograph to compare with the higher powered SBIG configuration. We brought some of the unprocessed data / images back from La Palma but have unfortunately been unable to process the SBIG ones yet as they as FITS format, for which I have not yet found suitable software (more on this another time). However, the Canon 350 D photographs are of equal but different beauty, which through the wide-field format show larger areas of sky, sometimes revealing vast groups of galaxies – amazing!

M1 The Crab Nebula
Canon 350 D | 240 secs @ ISO800

M3 a globular cluster in the constellation of Canes Venatici
Canon 350 D | 240 secs @ ISO800

M84 a lenticular or elliptical galaxy located in the inner core of the Virgo Cluster of Galaxies
Canon 350 D | 240secs @ ISO 800

Virgo Group of Galaxies – a field of nine galaxies in the western part of the cluster group of over 2,000 galaxies!
Canon 350 D | 240secs @ ISO800

Moving through space

August 23, 2014 by grahamrob in General Astronomy, Imaging, Widefield Imaging | 1 Comment

Astrophotography is difficult, very difficult but probably one problem stands out above all others. The platform we are taking the images from, Earth, is moving at about 67,000 mph on its way around the sun every 365 days and just over 1,000 mph rotating on its axis every 24 hours, which is tilted at approximately 23^orelative to its orbit around the sun. Over a year the annual journey around the sun, combined with the planet’s tilt provides us with the seasons and the astronomer with a different views of the universe, which despite the overall velocity does not unduly affect imaging over short periods measured in seconds or even minutes. However, the rotation of the Earth every 24 hours is another matter, particularly when photographing objects over any period of time greater than a few seconds, which is required for most objects, especially more distant DSO.

In understanding how this last movement impacts on the nature of the sky we see and in order to photograph objects – as well as forming a basis for navigation around the night sky – we have developed a system that is analogous to that used for navigating across the globe i.e. Longitude and Latitude but now called Right Ascension or RA and Declination or DEC.

For the purpose of establishing lines of RA and DEC a celestial sphere must be imagined of an arbitrarily large radius, concentric with a celestial body – in this case Earth. In a similar way to Earth, a celestial equator is likewise established, this being in the same plane as the Earth’s equator but projected upwards onto the celestial sphere – as a result if the Earths tilt, it too is inclined at 23.4^o with respect to the elliptical plane. Having established the sphere and the equator, RA is then described as the angular distance along the celestial equator and DEC measures the distance above or below the celestial equator along any RA line in degrees. This imaginary framework can then be used to describe the positon of any object or its relative position over time in space in the sky that we see from Earth.

The Celestial Sphere – a grid of RA & DEC lines across the sphere can be used to define the position of objects in the sky. Looking south in the Northern Hemisphere, the Celestial Equator is inclined across the sky from east to west and bisected vertically due south by the Meridian line (not shown) – the optimal RA line for astroimaging

In order to follow an object for imaging it is necessary to hold the telescope / camera in a stationary position relative to the movement of the object; remember that we are at the same time spinning at 1,000mph relative to space. This is very difficult but in astrophotography is usually achieved by the means of an Equatorial Mount which, through some very sophisticated software that computes the relative movements of the object and the telescope, gently slews the mount-telescope-camera combination using gears and belts in such a way that the telescope and hence camera, remain fixed upon the chosen object. The result, when undertaken with care, will be a wonderful sharp image of an almost endless number of features in the night sky, which is the subject of many of the posts on this website

Conversely, what happens if we deliberately do not follow the sky’s objects in this way but hold the camera effectively still relative to the sky’s movement, created by Earth’s daily rotation. The answer is Star trails, which I set out to obtain the other evening. In order to achieve such a picture, the DSLR camera is fixed on a tripod and using an intervalometer, a long exposure of the night sky above is taken; alternatively a large series of shorter exposures can be made over a long period of time and then stacked to produce a better quality final image. As a result the stars trace their respective paths of light across the camera’s sensor, as the Earth moves at 1,000 mph on its axis. Such movement is normally indiscernible over short periods of time but through this process it is clear to see in the form of wonderful star trails. Of course the stars haven’t moved at all (at least not in a normal visual sense) it’s us that are moving, very fast. It is beautiful and clear evidence that we on Earth are continually moving through space!