Flip Flop

Another night, another lesson learned, the hard way.

A good, clear sky on Saturday meant the prospect of a long and productive imaging session before the frost came down.  Whilst Orion has now moved to early evening, the light pollution from Gatwick airport to the south is bad at that time, so I’ll grab what I can but later is better when the light pollution starts to subside; from experience I presume they start to turn off the airport lights gradually from about 10pm, so that by midnight the sky is noticeably darker and much better for astronomy – though nothing like a true dark sky.  I therefore look more to the south east at about 8pm to line up potential imaging targets for about one to two hours later when objects will be  located at their best position, towards the Celestial Meridian and preferably high in the sky; such a location reduces the thickness of the atmosphere and improves tracking accuracy as the telescope’s angle with the object is less extreme.  At the moment this means something in or around the constellation of Gemini and later at night Cancer; Canis Major, Pupis and Hydra also fit the bill except for one critical problem, they are too low in the sky and are mostly obscured by houses and trees, grrrrr!

sky-06h00

Having imaged three, mostly easier objects earlier in the evening, at about 10pm I then turned my attention to something more challenging.  Though large at some 100 light-years in diameter, the wonderfully named Jellyfish Nebula in the Gemini constellation (not far from the M35 open star cluster), with an apparent magnitude  of +12 is quite faint and would be difficult to photograph.  Notwithstanding, my first test image showed it was already in my field-of-view, though as anticipated faint, which I then set about adjusting to optimize its position within the frame before starting imaging.  In this regard two bright, dominant stars flank the nebula – to the left or East, Tejat Posterior and to the right or West, Propus – thus assisting on screen identification and the approximate position of the nebula on the camera’s sensor.

At this time the nebula was very close to the aforementioned Celestial Meridian and it was clear that during a 1-hour imaging run would actually cross the Meridian, thus requiring a so called ‘Meridian Flip’.  When setting-up the EQ-mount and telescope at the start, it is essential that they are aligned parallel with the Celestial Meridian in order that the mount and scope will then exactly track the movement of the night sky during subsequent viewing or imaging.  However, due to the physical nature (internal gears) and resulting constraints of the mount and tripod, as tracking proceeds from east to west and eventually encounters the Celestial Meridian, it is necessary to carry out a Meridian Flip, manually or automatically.  Such a flip requires that the mount and thus telescope and camera are swung from the west side of the tripod to the east, thereby ensuring that in continuing to track the object as it proceeds westwards they do not come into contact with the tripod.

Using the guide stars of Tejat Prosper and Propus to mark the East and West limits of the nebula and expecting the bulk of the other associated nebulosity to extend upwards, I positioned the stars towards the bottom of the frame.  However, the nebula had by now crossed the Meridian and the telescope and camera was switched (flipped) to the other side of the mount before I completed framing.  In-so-doing and, in my defence operating in the dark, I had overlooked that as a consequence of flipping across the Meridian, the camera had been inverted.  Oblivious to this change of the camera’s attitude, I continued to frame the stars and thus hopefully placing the nebula towards the bottom of the image, when instead I should be moving them towards the top of the frame as the camera was now upside down.  The result was that the final image unfortunately misses some of the associated nebulosity, though thankfully not the Jellyfish itself.

IC 443 The Jellyfish Nebula with Propus to the left and Tejat Prosper to the right after inverting the camera.  As a result much of the considerable interstellar cloud illuminated by interaction with the nebula is outside the  bottom of the image. WO GT81 + Canon 550D + FF | 20 x 180 secs @ ISO 1,600 + calibration | 24th January 2015

IC 443 The Jellyfish Nebula, with Propus to the left and Tejat Prosper to the right after a Meridian Flip inverted the camera before framing.  As a result much of the interstellar cloud illuminated by interaction with the nebula is lost outside the bottom of the image.
WO GT81 + Canon 550D + FF | 20 x 180 secs @ ISO 1,600 + calibration | 24th January 2015

The Jellyfish Nebula is considered to be the remnant of a supernova that took place between 3,000 and 30,000 years ago and is now interacting with surrounding molecular clouds.  Like similar supernovae such as M1 the Crab Nebula, the Jellyfish also harbours a neutron star within, indicating a collapsed stellar core.  The main Jellyfish is some 100 light-years across and 5,000 light years away from Earth.

IC-443 Jellyfish Nebula,  correctly orientated Propus is now to the right.

IC-443 Jellyfish Nebula, correctly orientated Propus is now to the right.

The denser, though still delicate nebulosity of the main ‘Jellyfish’ feature, is located immediately east of Prospus but most of the entire field between the two aforementioned stars and an equal area above is also occupied by extensive, though more faint nebulosity – it was this which was lost in my final image due to the framing error noted above.  Even with the new modded camera and 180 second exposures at ISO 1,600, the sensor has struggled to capture all the light but I am fascinated and pleased nonetheless with the result.  A better image of IC-443 AKA the Jellyfish Nebula will have to wait until I am able to undertake much longer exposures, which I hope to do one of these days soon.  In the meantime, I will be more aware of the Meridian Flip and its associated problems.

Seeing Red

It was towards the end of last year I realised what I was missing in my images. Hydrogen alpha (Ha) is a deep-red spectral line created by energised hydrogen gas, with a wavelength of 656.28nm, such light is a dominant feature of emission nebulae. However, terrestrial cameras are made with an infra-red (IR) filter placed over the sensor in order to achieve the red-green-blue colours that typify what the human eye see as life on Earth.  Unfortunately by filtering out some of the red wavelengths this has a negative impact on DSO astroimaging, as it will block the aforementioned Ha light. The result is that imaging such Ha features with a DSLR camera, as I have been doing with a Canon 700D, can significantly reduce the colour and even detail – in some cases where Ha is the principal light source the camera sensor may almost completely fail to register the object at all.

I had been aware of this problem from the outset when I purchased the Canon 700D but decided to make-do in order to see, (a) how I got on, and (b) if I even liked astrophotography.  Nearly one year on and maybe I made a mistake then but I also enjoy using the camera for terrestrial photography.  Here’s the catch: to improve the camera’s sensitivity to Ha it is necessary to remove the IR filter, to become what is then known colloquially as a modded camera, however, in doing so the camera becomes useless for terrestrial photography. Removing the IR filter allows more red light wavelengths to reach the sensor and, as a result, terrestrial pictures then acquire an overall pink-red hue! There are some ways round this but, as always with implications – but it was now clear I needed a modded camera.

There are three basic ways to ‘restore’ a modded camera for terrestrial use:

  1. Adjust the custom white balance – each time the white balance needs to be set manually, depending on the type of prevailing light and subject. It will work but, in my opinion, makes the process of day-to-day photography something of a chore and certainly reduces the scope for spontaneity, something I like when I am out-and-about photographing.
  1. Restore the colour balance during post-processing – basically this requires adjusting each photograph individually using processing software, such as Photoshop, to remove excess red that is reaching the sensor without the IR filter.
  1. Use an OWB (Original White Balance) filter – like the CLS light pollution filter I already use, this filter fits snuggly in front of the mirror / behind the camera lens (if fitted) and essentially acts like the original IR filter that has now been removed for astrophotography. Although quite expensive, this is by far the most convenient solution but there’s a problem: the back-focus section of the standard Canon EF-S lens I use is too long to accommodate the filter. An EF or other manufacture’s lens would overcome this problem (at further expense) and I was about to go down this route when serendipity paid a visit.

Not to be taken literally, but sometimes I would rather be lucky than smart.  Whilst researching the aforementioned issues and seeking out other possible solutions, such as purchasing an already modded camera, I registered on the excellent Astronomy Shed forum and posted a question on how to deal with my problem. By the next morning, together with other advice on how to proceed, my attention was drawn to a Canon 550D for sale that had just been posted on the forum that very moment.  Furthermore, the price was good and the seller would modify the camera for a small charge; it requires a degree of expertise to carry this out but, as a professional photographer with an interest in astronomy, the seller had undertaken this successfully many times before, though I obtained references to be sure.  Therefore, after a few online exchanges, I became the new owner of a modified Canon 550d camera, together with some other bits and pieces – leads, intervalometer and a Canon battery grip.

Apart from the fact that this was a good camera, at a good price, it had one other very useful attraction – it is a close relation of my other camera, the Canon 700D (about three years older in development terms) and thus I immediately knew my way around and, furthermore, all my existing accessories would fit.  Like I said, I had just got lucky – in more than one way.  It’s early days but, with a clear sky last Friday and plenty to image at the moment, I just had to try it out and was not disappointed.

Rosette Nebula WO GT81 + Canon 550d (modded) + FF | 15 x 120secs @ ISO1,600 + darks/bias/flats | 16th January 2015

Rosette Nebula
WO GT81 + Canon 550d (modded) + FF | 15 x 120secs @ ISO1,600 + darks/bias/flats | 16th January 2015

The evening’s targets were Comet Lovejoy, The Rosette Nebula and the Great Orion Nebula, of which the latter two showed off the camera’s new capabilities best. The difference was there to see immediately with the images straight out the camera and stacked, with a noticeable increase of red colour present.  The benefit after post processing is perhaps more subtle but, I suspect, will become more apparent when I move on to objects where Ha is more abundant, such as NGC 2264 AKA The Christmas Tree Cluster & Cone Nebula, which when imaged just before Christmas showed just what I was missing – a shortage of red light and thereby significant detail of these beguiling astronomical objects.  Hopefully this issue will now become a thing of the past and in the future I will be literally seeing red, for all the right reasons.

M42 & NGC 1977 After DSS stacking only WO GT81 + Canon 700D (unmodded) + FF | 15 x 120secs @ ISO800 darks/bias/flats

M42 & NGC 1977 After DSS stacking only
WO GT81 + Canon 700D (unmodded) + FF | 15 x 120secs @ ISO800 darks/bias/flats

M42 + NGC 1977 After DSS stacking WO GT81 + Canon 550D (modded) + FF | 5 x 120secs @ISO1,600  + darks

M42 + NGC 1977 After DSS stacking
WO GT81 + Canon 550D (modded) + FF | 5 x 120secs @ISO1,600 + darks

The above stacked, pre-post processing images are the same objects shot with unmodded (Canon 700D) and modded (Canon 550D) cameras, showing a marked increased in red light using the modded camera following the removal of the IR filter. Below, the same images after post-processing.    

Final, post-processing image from unmodded camera

Final, post-processing image from unmodded camera

Final, post processing image using modified camera

Final, post-processing image using modified camera

 

Lovejoy Part-2

I first became acquainted with C/2014 Q2 Comet Lovejoy just before Christmas and have since been keen to obtain my own image of the object from Fairvale Observatory; at the time I was fortunate to obtain a photograph of the comet from a fellow astronomer in La Palma.  Despite the comet reaching its best positon on January 7th, some 44 million miles from Earth and with the apparent magnitude (brightness) improving throughout January to less than +4.0, unfortunately nature and life prohibited me from attempting this task: Christmas, New Year, travel, bad weather, full Moon etc.  A couple of clear skies did present a good visual sighting through binoculars but no image.

Last week, on Thursday evening, I eventually got my first opportunity but due to very strong winds (hence the clear sky) was unable to even set-up the equipment.  The following evening a cold but clear sky again occurred and this time I took my chance.

Photographing and processing a comet is not straightforward.  Since my last post, Comet Lovejoy has tracked west (to the right) of the Orion constellation and at the time of imaging was located just above the western end of Taurus, before it passes west of Pleiades on 19th January.  The first problem is therefore obvious – it’s travelling very fast, about 82,000 mph.  Fortunately Livecometdata.com provides real time information on the comet’s journey, which is both impressive (how does it do this?) and very useful.  Inputting the real time RA and DEC location data into the SynScan handset, the mount slewed straight to the comet, which was just off-centre of the field of view.  And thus I had my first, proper live view of a comet – fantastic! Now for the tricky part: how to get an image?

I had already posed this question on Stargazers Lounge and had a number of useful suggestions. Of course, whilst the mount tracks the celestial sphere, the comet is making its own way through the sky, which is not the same path as the stars seen from Earth; I believe it is possible to track the actual comet but that’s too difficult for me. Therefore, it is necessary to err towards lots of shorter exposures to avoid blurring; the longer the exposure the more likely it is the comet’s tail can also be captured in the image but it is a fine line between achieving this and blurring.  In the end I took two sets of images at 20 seconds and 60 seconds – probably too cautious but I was happy with the result and will be better prepared for my next comet, whenever that is.

Then came the next obstacle – stacking and processing.  I had not thought about this before but in the world of stacking, the software is unable to distinguish the comet from stars.  As a result it is necessary to identify the comet in each light frame by manually tagging it; at this point I regretted taking x40 exposures! Deep Sky Stacker will then stack using one of three procedures which basically prioritises either the comet or the stars or a combination of both – I chose the latter.  As usual post processing in Photoshop is then used to improve the final image.

C/2014 Q2 Comet Lovejoy WO GT81 + Canon 550D (modded) & FF | 40 x 20secs @ ISO1,600 + darks | 16th January 2014

C/2014 Q2 Comet Lovejoy
WO GT81 + Canon 550D (modded) & FF | 40 x 20secs @ ISO1,600 + darks | Fairvale Observatory 16th January 2015

Whilst I am very excited to have successfully photographed Comet Lovejoy, I was less than impressed by the stacked image and actually prefer the original.  Processing comet images takes the dark art of processing to a new level and I feel I’ve only reached the learning foothills so far.

Lovejoy will be in the sky for some weeks to come as it tracks across Andromeda and Perseus during February and into Cassiopeia in March.  Whilst the best may be almost past, I certainly hope to follow its progress and, subject to conditions, might even attempt to image it once again before it continues its 8,000 year orbit into deep space.  However, for now I’ve got my comet and am well satisfied – I will spend the intervening winter days practicing my comet stacking.

Comet Lovejoy WO GT81 + Canon 550D & FF | 15 x 60 secs @ ISO1,600 + darks| 16th January 2015

Comet Lovejoy
WO GT81 + Canon 550D (modded) & FF | 15 x 60 secs @ ISO1,600 + darks| Fairvale Observatory 16th January 2015

The Eyes Have It

Before the cloud rolled in the other night and already successfully imaged the Rosette Nebula in Monoceros and M35 in Gemini, I decided to turn my attention once again towards Orion – it’s addictive! Having previously imaged M42 the Great Orion Nebula and other features of Orion’s Sword, the Flame and Horeshead Nebula, Orions belt and a basic widefield image of the constellation – alas without Barnard’s Loop and the Anglefish Nebula – it was time to tackle some of the more elusive objects.

orion

This time the challenge was size – less than 6 arc-minutes overall and located nearby to Alnitak – the reflection nebula M78 would be difficult for my telescope.  Whilst the mount was well aligned and I was confident the GoTo software would accurately point towards the chosen target, as is often the case, the original image was not promising.  However, after stacking and some delicate post-processing, the nebula became apparent. Peering out of a hole in a misty patch of interstellar dust were two ‘eyes’ formed of 10th magnitude stars, thus illuminating the nebula.

Section of sky located just above Alnitak - not promising but look closer.

Section of sky located just above Alnitak – not promising but look closer.

At this magnification further detail is not possible but nonetheless, the image is intriguing.  M78 (NGC 2068) is the brightest (+8.3 magnitude) portion of the dust cloud which also includes NGC 2071, NGC 2067 and NGC 2064, all (just) visible in the image.  Together with the Flame Nebula, all these nebulae are associated with the LDN 1630 molecular cloud, part of the larger Orion complex.  I’ll need something like a 10” or bigger scope to reveal better detail but at the end of an already successful night, the image was pleasing – I look forwards to looking into those eyes again one day.

M78 (top left) with NGC 2071 (lower right) WO GT81 + Canon 700D + FF | 15 x 120 secs @ ISO1,600 | 30th December 2014

M78 (top left) with NGC 2071 (lower right)
WO GT81 + Canon 700D + FF | 15 x 120 secs @ ISO1,600 | 30th December 2014

2 for 1

Whilst I know of Gemini I have limited knowledge about this constellation that, like Monoceros, starts to play a more prominent part in the night sky here after 10 pm at this time of the year.  Located immediately above Monoceros and north east if Orion, Gemini is Latin for twins and its asterism appropriately forms two stickmen whose ‘heads’ are formed by the stars of Castor and Pollux, also suitably twin brothers from Greek mythology.

Gemini

At the western extremity of Gemini, beyond Tejat Posterior (which means back foot), just above the ‘left foot’ of the upper stickman, lies the open cluster M35.  Located at the heart of the Milky Way and 2,700 light-years from Earth, M35 is formed of some 2,700 young stars of between 100 and 200 million years old.  On the same clear, cold evening I recently photographed the Rosette Nebula, I also produced an interesting image of M35 with good colours, including some yellow-orange stars.

Because of its short focal length, the relatively wide field-of-view of the William Optics GT81 can be both a good and sometimes a bad feature, depending on the size of the object being viewed.  From experience so far, it seems that the scope and DSLR camera produces good to fair resolution for objects down to about 5 arcminutes.  Whilst objects below this size can be identified, the power of the scope and sensitivity of the camera sensor can usually only show the presence of such features without providing useful detail.  However, at other times this set-up is perfect for wider but still detailed images that sometimes lead to me other, unexpected objects in the same picture.  The image of M35 is just such an example.

At the time of imaging, the less-than clear initial RAW images from the camera, with a dark blue hue from the CLS light pollution filter, nevertheless indicated that M35 was nicely positioned at the centre of the picture, with good resolution of the component stars.  However, it was evident that there were also some other bright features away from the M35 open cluster which I had not anticipated. Notable amongst these was what seemed like a pale yellow smudge to the immediate west, the importance of which only became apparent after stacking and post processing.

M35 & NGC 2158 Open Clusters WO GT81 + Canon 700D (unmodded) | 15 x 120 secs @ ISO 1,600 & calibration

M35 (Centre) & NGC 2158 (Lower right) Open Clusters
WO GT81 + Canon 700D (unmodded) | 15 x 120 secs @ ISO 1,600 & calibration

It turns out that M35’s neighbour, 20 arcminutes to the south-west, is no less than NGC 2158 – another cluster. To the eye NGC 2158 seems to form an attractive, golden globular cluster.  In fact it too is an open cluster but located more than 9,000 light-years beyond M35 and at 2 billion years, is much older.  As they say, with age comes beauty, and I find this feature to be the more interesting of the two, all the more so as I was not expecting to see anything there, instead I got 2 for 1.

Raising the bar

My short astroimaging journey has been marked by a number of challenges, which looking back can now be viewed as important steps and achievements that have made it all worthwhile.

First trying to get a recognisable astronomy picture of anything using a compact camera: widefield on a tripod or afocal through the telescope eyepiece.  Afocal imaging was surprisingly difficult to do well, even when using a camera clamp.  Eventually I managed to obtain a crude photograph of the Orion Nebula, which nevertheless showed its colour and the Trapezium star cluster.  Whilst basic, at the time I was very pleased and found the capture of the nebula’s light itself something of a seminal moment for me; using a basic compact camera, it had been possible to reveal hithero unseen colours and nebulosity. I wanted more.

M42 The Great Orion Nebula Afocal image | February 2014

M42 The Great Orion Nebula
Afocal image | February 2014

Next, with the objective of achieving basic images of other iconic astronomical objects, I adopted two paths using (a) an astronomy webcam, and (b) a DSLR camera.  At this stage I had added RA and DEC motor drives to my EQ3-2 mount, which then allowed the telescope and attached camera to track the desired object and thus achieve longer exposures required to improve quality and detail.  However, this set-up was still quite basic, with exposures of no more than 20 seconds possible without producing star trails.  Furthermore, finding the desired objects and focussing remained quite difficult.

M45 The Pleiades Canon 700 D DSLR + 150PL Newtonian relfector + x2 Barlow |February 2014

M45 The Pleiades
150PL Newtonian relfector + EQ3-2 mount + Canon 700D + x2 Barlow |February 2014

223242_castr

Mars 150PL Newtonian reflector + EQ3-2 mount + ZWO ASI 120 MC webcam + x2 Barlow | May 2014

The breakthrough came in June 2014 when I acquired an AZ-EQ6 Mount, which when properly aligned significantly improved tracking accuracy and thereby extended exposure times of up to 180 seconds; for various reasons this was not easy to set-up properly and took some months to master.  At the same time I also obtained  a William Optics GT81 apochromatic triplet refractor telescope which, in combination with the mount, held the prospect of even better astrophotography.

Since then I have slowly been trying to, (i) learn how to use all the various facets of the new equipment, and through this (ii) to improve the quality of my images and tackle new, hitherto unseen features.  I have made good progress with the equipment in recent months, although there is still much untapped potential.  However, improved imaging is now revealing the otherwise inaccessible world of Deep Sky Objects that is nothing less than incredible, exciting and very rewarding.

M57 Ring Nebula, close-up with polar alignment. Canon 700D | 24x30sec @ ISO 1,600

M57 Ring Nebula
William Optics GT81 + AZ-E6 GT mount | Canon 700D | 24 x 30 secs @ ISO 1,600 | September 2014

M45, The Pleiades or Seven Sisters star cluster Canon 700D unguided | 26 x 90 secs darks/bias/flats @ ISO 800

M45 The Pleiades or Seven Sisters star cluster
William Optics GT81 + AZ-EQ6 GT mount (unguided) + Canon 700D DSLR| 26 x 90 secs darks/bias/flats @ ISO 800 | October 2014

The Orion Nebula October 2014 - the secondary feature in the top left corner is another nebula, M43.  Orientated with equatorial North up and East to the left. Canon 700D unguided | 20 x 90 secs + darks/bias/flats @ ISO 800

M42 The Orion Nebula 
William Optics GT81 + AZ-EQ6 GT mount (unguided) | Canon 700D + field flattener| 20 x 90 secs + darks/bias/flats @ ISO 800 | October 2014

At this time of the year it is necessary to grab every opportunity possible for imaging and so it was last Monday.  With the new, waxing Moon dominating the sky until about 10.30 pm and the probable onset of dew, or worst still frost sometime after midnight, the window of opportunity was likely to be limited and cold.  As it turned out, when I started to set-up and align the equipment at 9.30 pm it was a balmy 4oC, which subsequently cooled to less than 2oC by midnight and -1oC when I packed up after 2.00 am.  However, the relative humidity during most of this time varied only between 75% and 78%, thus delaying the onset of dew and eventually frost until shortly before 2.00 am.

The wonderful Orion constellation still dominates the sky at the moment but having recently ‘discovered’ the Monoceros constellation, I wanted to continue to get better acquainted with some of its exciting objects as well as something new in Orion.  Shortly before Christmas I managed to image my first Monoceros target, NGC 2264 or the Christmas Tree and Cone Nebulae.  Whilst pleased with the outcome of this seasonal object, the image suffered from noise and some lack of detail arising from the pre-dominance of Ha-light which my unmodded camera is unable to record – note to Father Christmas, modified DSLR in 2015 please.  I was concerned that my next object might suffer from the same problem but in the short imaging time I had available, was determined to improve the quality through better alignment, more subs and longer exposures of 120 seconds at ISO 1,600.  The result was excellent and, I believe, shows how far I have come with astroimaging since my earlier afocal photographs just over one year ago.  Practice + perseverance + patience = results (sometimes).

The main target this time was the Rosette Nebula, situated to the south west of NGC 2264. This giant molecular cloud of hydrogen gas consists of four nebulae (NGC 2237, 2238, 2239 & 2246), some 130 light-years in size with an open star cluster at the centre – NGC 2244.  At about 5 million years old, these superhot stars are young and still being formed, with a brightness estimated to be some 400,000 times greater than our Sun.  It is the energy and light from these stars that excites and illuminates the surrounding Rosette Nebula, which itself dominates the image.

NGC 2244 Rosette Nebula William Optics GT 81 + AZ-EQ6 GT mount  (unguided)+ Canon 700D DSLR| 30 x 120 secs @ ISO1,600 | 29th December 2014

NGC 2244 Rosette Nebula
William Optics GT 81 + AZ-EQ6 GT mount (unguided)+ Canon 700D DSLR| 30 x 120 secs @ ISO1,600 | 29th December 2014

Amongst various definitions, a rosette is the French diminutive of rose.  It is also an award given for achievements.  I’d like to think that this image captures both of these definitions – as a beautiful red, rose-like nebula and my personal award to mark a another milestone in my quest over the past year.  A rosette may also typically be awarded to the winners at a show jumping or similar sporting event – in a comparable way, it’s now time for me to raise the astroimaging bar higher in 2015.